USPTO serial 85300999
ALLEGRETTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLEGRETTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
38106 Braunschweig, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Lampe
THOMAS R. LAMPE BIELEN, LAMPE & THOEMING1390 WILLOW PASS RD STE 1020CONCORD, CA 94520-5288UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric coffee percolators; coffee-filters not of paper being part of electric coffee makers; coffee roasters; electric coffee makers; electric tea kettles; cocoa bean roasters; portable, self-service thermoelectric heating unit for foods and beverages, in particular for hot soups and drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, including coffee beans, roasted coffee and instant coffee, artificial coffee, coffee flavorings, coffee and coffee-based beverages, tea, cocoa, cocoa beverages with milk, cocoa-based beverages, tea-based beverage, tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring, chocolate-based beverages with milk, chocolate-food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; pastries; chocolate confections; candy; biscuits; flavored ices; sugar; flavoring syrup for improving and altering the taste of coffee, tea, cocoa, and chocolate-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing of food and drink, in particular, in cafeterias, self-service cafeterias, tea rooms, coffee houses,cafes, bars, and restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2011 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |