Drawing for CRYSTAL CUT

USPTO serial 85303532

CRYSTAL CUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYSTAL CUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus P. Dolce

Marcus P. Dolce Flynn, Thiel, Boutell & Tanis, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033alcoholic beverages, except beers, wine, sparkling wine, Champagne wine, wine-based beverages, sparkling wine-based beverages, Champagne wine-based beveragesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 6, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Nov 17, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2011CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Sep 6, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Aug 30, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2011EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance