Drawing for NAKED NAILS

USPTO serial 85306725

NAKED NAILS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, JASON E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAKED NAILS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Garson

Robert Garson Garson, Segal, Steinmetz, Fladgate LLP164 West 25th Street11RNew York, NY 10001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Nail polish; Nail polish base and top coats; Nail polish remover; Nail and hand care products, namely, creams, moisturizers, oils, and nail care preparationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 18, 2012INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED
Jul 18, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Nov 3, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2011CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Sep 1, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Sep 1, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 20, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
May 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 9, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
May 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance