USPTO serial 85309200
OWNERBILT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OWNERBILT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Honolulu, HI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction; Building construction information; Building construction services; Construction and renovation of buildings; Construction of buildings; Construction of facilities, structures, living quarters, and utility buildings, production modules and subsea modules in the oil and gas industry; Construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of commercial buildings; Consultation in building construction supervision; Consultation services in the field of construction of environmentally-conscious buildings; Consulting in the field of building construction; Contractor services, namely, review of and remedial recommendations for building plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems for others; Custom construction and building renovation; General building contractor services; General contractor services, namely, plumbing, heating and air conditioning, carpentry, drywall, painting, electrical, building and framing contractor services; House and building demolition; House building and repair; Land development services, namely, planning and laying out of commercial buildings; Planning and laying out of factory buildings; Residential and building construction consulting; Residential and commercial building construction; Technical consultation in the field of building construction; Technical consultation in the field of building materials, namely, cementitious materials, asphalt and aggregates | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2012 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |