USPTO serial 85313300
MAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk M. Miles, Registration No. 37,891
KIRK M. MILES THE WEBB LAW FIRM420 FORT DUQUESNE BLVD STE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-1435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Construction materials, namely, floor panels made primarily from metal, for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring, featuring a liquid controlling surface; construction materials, namely, floor panels made primarily from metal, for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring; indoor/outdoor flooring made primarily from metal featuring liquid controlling surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicle trunk organizers, namely, boot trays; fitted truck bed liners | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Construction materials, namely, non-metal floor panels made primarily from plastic, rubber, or synthetics for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring, which construction materials feature liquid controlling surfaces; construction materials, namely, non-metal floor panels made primarily from plastic, rubber, or synthetics for use in the construction of flooring, interlocking floor tiles, and modular flooring; indoor/outdoor flooring made primarily from plastic, rubber, or synthetics featuring liquid controlling surfaces; liquid controlling mats for use on pallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Surface coverings, namely, vehicular mats made from metal, plastic, rubber, or synthetics, namely, floor mats for automobiles which feature a liquid controlling surface; surface coverings, namely, vehicular mats made from metal, plastic, rubber, or synthetics, namely, floor mats for automobiles which feature a liquid controlling surface and are linkable to form different sized mats; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic bath mats; indoor/outdoor floor mats; protective floor coverings, namely, mats for use while painting; floor mats for land, sea, and air vehicles; mats for engine compartments of cars, trucks, and boats; construction mats for containing corrosive materials; urinal mats, namely, bath mats; pet mats, namely, pet feeding mats and pet litter pan floor mats; conveyor webbings, namely, conveyor belts; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic floor mats; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic floor mats which feature a liquid controlling surface; residential mats made from plastic, namely, plastic floor mats which are linkable to form different sized mats; industrial floor mats made from plastic, rubber, or synthetics, namely, liquid containment and control mats which feature liquid controlling surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sanderson, James
- Other trademarks owned by Sanderson, James
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named MAZE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |