USPTO serial 85313749
LIQUIDMETAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIQUIDMETAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce B. Brunda
BRUCE B. BRUNDA STETINA, BRUNDA, GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pump impellers | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | MRI diagnostic apparatus, nuclear medicine imaging apparatus for research purposes; nuclear medicine imaging apparatus; ultrasonic sensors and devices, namely, medical imaging; apparatus and instruments for electrophoresis and mass spectrometry; metering devices for metering liquids, namely, metering devices for laboratory requirements, namely, volumetric flasks, measuring cylinders, pipettes, burettes | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Orthopedic joint implants, namely, knee and hip implants; surgical screws; coating sold as an integral component of medical stents and other implantable medical devices, namely, cardiac pacemakers and heart pacemakers; vacuum pumps for medical purposes; medical apparatus for diagnosing or treating respiratory conditions, namely, respiratory aspirators; medical cutting devices, medical apparatus and units for dosage, measuring and monitoring, namely, drug delivery devices and systems; hydrophilic guide wire to track catheters; laparoscopic tools and devices namely, scissors, forceps; medical syringes; drug delivery systems; phaco tips for cataract removal; surgical tools, namely, scalpels, stapling devices and staples, pliers, trocars, endoscopy micro-nano scale tools and machines; fixation implants comprised of artificial material used in the bone and neck; medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, orthopedic fixation device used in orthopedic transplant and/or implant surgery; ophthalmic tools devices and equipment, namely, tools, devices and equipment for locating grooves, engravings and other indicia on ophthalmic lenses; ophthalmic instruments, namely, instruments for measuring the diameter of ophthalmic lenses; ophthalmic instruments, namely, instruments for locating the optical center of ophthalmic lenses; dental devices and equipment, namely, dental bridges, inlays; dental implants; brachytherapy devices, namely, radiation shields | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Rubber hermetic seals for machine use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named LIQUIDMETAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2014 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |