USPTO serial 85314754
ARTISTOCRACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARTISTOCRACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; cleansing creams; facial creams; skin fresheners; skin care preparations, namely, non-medicated skin-care preparations; masques or facial packs, namely, facial masks and packs for cosmetic use; eye shadow; mascara; cosmetic preparations for use on eyelashes; lipstick; lip gloss; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery; hair lotions; hair care preparations; essential oils; deodorants for personal use; toiletries, namely, non-medicated balms for use on the lips and skin, make-up remover, and skin moisturizers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store and on-line retail store services featuring cosmetics, perfumery, toiletries and non-medicated toilet preparations; preparation and placing of advertisements; arranging for and conducting demonstrations, all relating to beauty, perfumery, make-up and skin treatment, all for advertising and promotional purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |