USPTO serial 85318060
Serial No. 85318060
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 85318060?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Headphone cables sold as an integral component of headphones | ACTIVE | Jul 21, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2011 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 24, 2011 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |