USPTO serial 85318298
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | One-of-a-kind jewelry pieces made from precious metals, some with precious stones, and forming a collection featuring bracelets; brooches; jewelry; rings; women's jewelry | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |