USPTO serial 85319275
HARD RIDERS MC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARD RIDERS MC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Customized imprinting of company names and logos on the goods of others, namely, on promotional merchandise, apparel and corporate gifts | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2000 |
| 042 | Custom design of Boots, shirts, logos, pants, hats, jackets, scarfs, hankercheif, jumpsuits, jewelry and watches based on personal selections made by the customer | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |