USPTO serial 85320366
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sina.Com Technology (China) Co. Ltd.
Haidian Dist., Beijing, CN
Other trademarks owned by Sina.Com Technology (China) Co. Ltd.
BEIJING WEIMENG INTERNET TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
HAIDIAN, CN
Other trademarks owned by BEIJING WEIMENG INTERNET TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Sina.Com Technology (China) Co. Ltd.
Haidian Dist., Beijing, CN
Other trademarks owned by Sina.Com Technology (China) Co. Ltd.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ data-processing equipment and computers; computers; ] computer software for connecting computer network users and global computer networks; computer operating software; computer search engine software; computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; computer operating programs; computer programs for using the internet and the world wide web | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 2009 |
| 038 | electronic bulletin board services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing internet chat rooms | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 2009 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting and organizing classes, seminars, conferences, workshops and symposiums in the field of internet technology services | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 2009 |
| 042 | Research and development in internet technology for others; computer programming; computer software design and updating; maintenance of computer software; computer system design services; duplication of computer programs; computer software consultancy; rental of web servers; [ computer virus protection services; ] provision of search engines for the Internet | ACTIVE | Aug 28, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |