USPTO serial 85322035
KRICKETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRICKETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Wallets, diaper bags, hand bags, purses, tote bags; backpacks, travel bags, and sports bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, robes, loungewear, tops, blouses, shirts, pants, shorts, dresses, skirts, jackets, beach cover-ups, belts, shawls, scarves; gowns, headwear, and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |