USPTO serial 85323796
VOLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin H. McCarthy II
BRIAN P GREGG MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC100 PINE STREETPO BOX 1166HARRISBURG, PA 17108-1166Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | All purpose disinfectants for use by medical and dental professionals for cleaning and decontaminating hard non-porous surfaces and fixtures in hospitals, surgical centers, neonatal units, laboratories, medical and dental operatories, and for precleaning and decontaminating surgical, medical, and dental instruments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |