USPTO serial 85325355
SVB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SVB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour, ready-to-eat cereals, bread, pastry, confectionery made of sugar, candy, ices; honey, treacle, treacle syrup; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice, edible ices; ice for refreshment; sweetened ice treats; baking goods, namely, baking powders, baking soda, baking spices, barley flour, bread crumb, buckwheat flour, chili powders, chocolate powder, cinnamon, cooking salt, corn meal, corn starch, crystal sugar, cube sugar, curry powder, extracts used as flavoring, flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, flavoring syrup, flour, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, food starch, hot pepper powder, meat tenderizers, pepper, powdered sugar, seasonings, sugar, sugar substitutes, vinegar, wheat flour; chocolate covered snacks, namely, chocolate-covered nuts, chocolate-covered raisins, chocolate-covered pretzels and chocolate-covered fruits; pre-packaged dinners consisting of pasta or rice; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, and/or popped popcorn; macaroni salad; rice salad; pasta salad; chicory-based coffee substitute; flour pastries; candies; cookies; cakes; meat pies; fish pies; crisp bread crackers; breakfast cereals; salad dressings; malt for food purposes; chewing gum; catsup; chocolate; food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers, and/or cookies; fresh pizza; granola; granola snacks; fruit teas; noodles; natural sweetener; pasta; pizza; processed cereals; ready made sauces; rice cakes; processed grains; salsa; sugarless sweets; white sugar; iced tea; sugarless beverages, specifically, coffee, black, and herbal tea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |