USPTO serial 85326036
SHAMPOO CRE-C MAX!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4315513Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2013
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHAMPOO CRE-C MAX!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NAUCALPAN, MX
NAUCALPAN, MX
MANUEL ANTONIO MARTINEZ CARBALLO
MEXICO CITY, MX
MANUEL ANTONIO MARTINEZ CARBALLO
MEXICO CITY, MX
MANUEL ANTONIO MARTINEZ CARBALLO
MEXICO CITY, MX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic hair filling powders for covering bald and thinning spots on the scalp; Cosmetic hair regrowth inhibiting preparations; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Hair balsam; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Hair care products, namely, heat protection sprays; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair creams; Hair dressings for men; Hair dressings for women; Hair dye; Hair emollients; Hair frosts; Hair gel; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair gels; Hair glaze; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hair mascara; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair oils; Hair piece bonding glue; Hair products, namely, thickening control creams; Hair relaxers; Hair rinses;Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sheen spray; Hair spray; Hair sprays; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Hair waving lotion; Hair waving preparations; Hair-washing powder; Lotions for hair restoration; Non-medicated hair restoration lotions; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Styling clay for hair; Styling foam for hair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUAVE Y F??CIL, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by SUAVE Y FACIL, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MANUEL ANTONIO MARTINEZ CARBALLO
- Other trademarks owned by MANUEL ANTONIO MARTINEZ CARBALLO
- Other trademarks owned by MANUEL ANTONIO MARTINEZ CARBALLO
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SHAMPOO CRE-C MAX!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |