USPTO serial 85327535
PRIZE FIGHTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIZE FIGHTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Sigalow
DAVID L. SIGALOW ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH & GILCHRIST, P.A.255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801-3460UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded media, namely, video recordings, DVDs, optical discs, sound and music recordings, tapes, cassettes, compact discs, motion picture films, video cassettes and CD-ROMs all featuring music and musical-based entertainment; digital music downloadable from the Internet; games for use with televisions; computer games; video games; multimedia software featuring motion pictures and music for entertainment; downloadable telephone ring tones; digital music downloadable from the Internet; ring tones downloadable from the Internet; publications in electronic form, namely, books, magazines, brochures, posters, pamphlets featuring entertainment in the nature of information about live music and live sporting events recorded on computer media; downloadable publications, namely, books, magazines, brochures, posters, pamphlets featuring entertainment in the nature of information about live music and live sporting events from databases or from facilities provided on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, motion pictures and live music for entertainment; production of television programs, motion pictures, plays, audio programs and other entertainment; distribution of television programs, motion pictures, plays, audio programs and other entertainment in the nature of shows, musical shows, musical plays, concerts and music videos via the Internet; production of digital and online entertainment, namely, production of television programs, motion pictures, plays, audio programs and other entertainment in the nature of shows, musical shows, musical plays, concerts and music videos; entertainment services, namely, a multimedia program series featuring comedy, action and adventure distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media; production of pre-recorded media including digital versatile discs, optical discs and pre-recorded audio discs featuring films and music; information in the field of entertainment, motion pictures, music and television, including providing these services via the Internet; television and motion picture studio services; music publishing; publication of books and other printed publications, namely, magazines, brochures, posters, pamphlets, texts; arranging and conducting of seminars, educational conferences and educational exhibitions; presentation, production and performance of televisions programs, motion pictures, shows, musical shows and concerts; rental of multimedia in the nature of motion pictures for entertainment; and rental of multimedia in the nature of motion pictures for education | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Prizefighter Holdings Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Prizefighter Holdings Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PRIZE FIGHTER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |