USPTO serial 85328868
LAKOTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAKOTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra M. Koenig
MARK J MASTERSON FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVETHE HALLE BUILDING, 5TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicinal herbal remedies, namely echinacea; amino acid supplements for nutritional purposes; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of hair, skin and nails; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of pain; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of muscle and joint pain; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of arthritis; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of joint cartilage degeneration; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of prostate malfunction; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of colds; medicinal herbal preparations for the lubrication of joints; medicinal herbal preparations for the prevention of flu; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of pain in animals; liniments; vitamin supplements; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of diabetic related pain; medicinal herbal preparations for the treatment of neuropathic related pain; topical analgesics; mineral supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |