USPTO serial 85329330
STEAMERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEAMERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning supplies, namely, all purpose cleaners; all purpose cleaning preparations | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 007 | coffee extracting machines, clothes washing machines; multi purpose steam cleaners; steam turbines; steam cleaning machines; multi-purpose steam cleaners; multi-purpose high pressure washers | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 008 | cooking equipment, namely, cooking spoons | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 009 | computer game software, computer operating programs; computer software for processing order-taking, dispatch and administration; computer hardware; steam sterilizers for laboratories | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 010 | steam sterilizers for medical use | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 011 | Electric coffee machines; hydrogen-generation equipment and components, namely, hydrogen generators, hydrogen purifiers, hydrogen purification membranes, fuel processors, and steam reformers; spas in the nature of heated pools and steam rooms; steam generating installations; ironing tables that generate steam for ironing; cooking equipment, namely, microwave ovens; clothes dryer | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | cleaning equipment, namely, cleaning sponges | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 035 | Operation of a business for others, namely, cleaning services; Employment counseling and recruiting services; Assistance in business management and product commercialization within the framework of a franchise contract; Advice in the running of establishments as franchises; advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; Business management and consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Carpet cleaning services, rental of cleaning machines; swimming pool cleaning services; automobile cleaning services; cleaning services namely, in power plants and industrial facilities; dry cleaning services the remove stains; Emergency road side repair services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 038 | providing online chat rooms and electric bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 040 | energy recycling services that capture and convert wasted energy into electricity and useful steam | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | providing an interactive website featuring entertainment information | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | franchising services, namely, planning and design of information technology systems for business franchises | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 044 | emergency medical services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECITYDEALS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named STEAMERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2016 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2016 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |