USPTO serial 85331285
ECOSPAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOSPAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenbrae, CA
Greenbrae, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Semi-finished biopolymer-based resin and plastic shapes intended for further manufacture in the field of sporting goods and toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting goods and toys constructed from biopolymer-based resin and plastic shapes, namely, inflatable balls, balls for games, baseballs, footballs, basketballs, soccer balls, volley balls, tennis balls, bats for games, baseball bats, boards used in the practice of water sports, body-building apparatus, body-training apparatus, flying discs, bases, bats, and balls for playing indoor and outdoor games, manually-operated exercise equipment, snowboards, softball bats, sport balls, sportballs, surf boards, surfboards, swimming boards, water skis, waterskis, elbow guards, knee guards, nets for sports, tables for table tennis, golf accessories, namely, golf bags, golf ball tees and markers, divot repair tools, golf bags, golf clubs, and golf balls, billiard accessories, namely, balls, racks and cues, rubber balls, foam balls, vinyl balls, pumps for inflating sports balls, bath and squeezable squeaking toys, talking toys, toys with sound, namely, musical toys, talking toys, push toys, toys on a rope, namely, pull toys, toy boats, battery-operated toys, namely, battery-operated action toys, toy trucks, electronic learning toys, infant toys, spinning toys, namely, toys of various shapes that are connected to strings and spin, pet toys, pop-up toys, printing toys, pull toys, punching toys, rideable toy vehicles, rubber character toys, sand toys, sandbox toys, scale model kits, soft sculpture toys, squeeze toys, stacking toys, toy telephones, toy radios, toy helmets and toy pistols, toy guitars, toy musical instruments, toy pianos, toy drums, toys with microphones, namely, musical toys, electronic novelty toys that record, play back and distort or manipulate voices and sounds, dolls, figurines, namely, collectable toy figures, action figures, role-play toys, action figures, molded toy figures, electronic action toys, character toys, namely, plastic character toys, rubber character toys, electric toy vehicles, fantasy character toys, toy flying saucers, model toy vehicles, musical toys, toy airplanes, toy boats, toy bows and arrows, toy building blocks, toy clocks and watches, toy construction blocks, toy construction sets, toy furniture, toy houses, toy masks, toy microscopes, toy model train sets, toy putty, toy robots, toy rockets, toy scooters, toy tools, toy water toys, water-squirting toys, inflatable toys, toy balloons, toy swords, toy balls, toy kitchen items, namely, pots, pans, bakeware, toy food, toy dishes, toy kitchen utensils, namely, knives, spoons, forks, spatulas, whisks, turners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |