USPTO serial 85335890
DREAMCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DREAMCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pacific Palisades, CA
Pacific Palisades, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew H. Swyers, Esq.
MATTHEW H SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY2703 JONES FRANKLIN ROADSUITE 206CARY, NC 27518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for centralizing game playing used in interactive entertainment and game servers; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |