USPTO serial 85340461
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
London W1W 8BS, GB
London W1W 8BU, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Reed
JONATHAN A MENKES KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MARKET RESEARCH; MARKETING AND BRANDING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED COMMUNICATION PROGRAMS TO OBTAIN CONSUMER INSIGHTS AND DEVELOP BRANDING STRATEGIES; BRAND POSITIONING; BRAND TESTING; BRAND STRATEGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES; EVALUATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PRODUCTS, BRANDS AND DESIGNS DEVELOPMENT; PLANNING OF MARKETING CAMPAIGNS AND STRATEGIES IN THE FIELD OF BRAND DEVELOPMENT; BRAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; CORPORATE IDENTITY SERVICES; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO BRAND CREATION AND INFORMATION SERVICES IN THE SAME FIELD; ADVISORY, INFORMATION AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 23, 2009 |
| 042 | DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF GRAPHIC ART AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF GRAPHIC ART AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS FOR OTHERS, GRAPHIC ART, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN INNOVATION, NAMELY, ADVISING OTHERS IN THE AREAS OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION; PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, RESEARCH AND DESIGN; PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF GRAPHIC ART, NAMELY, CUSTOM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF GRAPHIC ARTS; ADVISORY INFORMATION AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 23, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |