USPTO serial 85344187
PATHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PATHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brandt R. Voight
BRANDT R VOIGHT BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLPONE AMERICAN SQUARESUITE 2300INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, training direct support professionals who work with individuals with intellectual and other developmental disabilities, namely, training in the fields of effective documentation, enhancing communication, ethics, conflict resolution, problem solving, health and safety management, facilitating community, participant empowerment, crisis intervention and effectively engaging and interacting with individuals with intellectual and other developmental disabilities | ABANDONED | May 31, 2002 |
| 042 | Accreditation services for direct support professionals who work with individuals with intellectual and other developmental disabilities, namely, developing and administering standards and procedures for certifying professionals in the fields of effective documentation, enhancing communication, ethics, conflict resolution, problem solving, health and safety management, facilitating community, participant empowerment, crisis intervention and effectively engaging and interacting with individuals with intellectual and other developmental disabilities | ABANDONED | May 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OHIO ASSOCIATION OF DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS
- Other trademarks owned by OHIO ASSOCIATION OF DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PATHS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |