USPTO serial 85344242
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER LLC115 NORTH HENRY STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2903UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymer-based artificial resins for rebuilding and resurfacing of metal pipes, tanks, and machinery metal components used in industry and subject to cavitation attack, not including polyurethane protective coatings | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |