Drawing for DURATOUGH

USPTO serial 85344242

DURATOUGH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURATOUGH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore A. Breiner

THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER LLC115 NORTH HENRY STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Polymer-based artificial resins for rebuilding and resurfacing of metal pipes, tanks, and machinery metal components used in industry and subject to cavitation attack, not including polyurethane protective coatingsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 3, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 3, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 20, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 8, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jan 8, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 19, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 19, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 27, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 27, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 13, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 7, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 2, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 6, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jun 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 16, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance