USPTO serial 85349800
MODERN CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODERN CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allan Chan
ALLAN CHAN ALLAN CHAN & ASSOCIATES225 BROADWAY STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10007-3790UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Egg roll stuffing consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, processed vegetables and game; Processed bean sprouts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Noodles; flour mix consisting primarily of edible flour; Cookies; crispy chow-mein noodles; cookies, namely, fortune cookies with vanilla flavor, chocolate flavor and other flavorings; edible food wrappers, namely, egg roll wrappers, won ton wrappers, egg noodles, spring roll wrappers, crispy chow mein noodles and won ton wrappers in strip form, moo shu wrappers, dumpling wrappers; prepared entrees consisting primarily of lo mein noodles, steamed noodles, and dried noodles; noodles in all different sizes and shapes, namely, Asian noodles; fortune cookies; lo-mein noodles; prepared entrees consisting primarily of lo-mein noodles; steamed egg noodles; chow-mein noodles; won ton noodles; spinach noodles; dried noodles; edible food wrappers, namely, thin won ton wrappers, and spring roll wrappers; egg roll mix | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Egg roll stuffing consisting primarily of unprocessed vegetables; Unprocessed bean sprouts; raw bean sprouts; fresh bean sprouts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2013 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 1, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |