USPTO serial 85360042
DAWG & KATZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4259397Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2012
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DAWG & KATZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Hughel
Patricia A. Hughel Brannon Sowers & Cracraft PC47 South Meridian Street, Suite 400Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Pet food and treats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2011 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring pet related accessories | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2011 |
| 036 | Charitable fund raising services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2011 |
| 043 | Providing pet care services, namely, pet hotel and day spa services; a restaurant for pets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frank J. Kiefer III
- Other trademarks owned by Frank J. Kiefer III
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named DAWG & KATZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |