USPTO serial 85365983
RAINCOAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAINCOAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Cohen
MICHAEL A. COHEN SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, P.C.1211 SW 5TH AVE STE 15002000PORTLAND, OR 97204-3735UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Natural food extracts derived from marine by-products and organisms such as fish, fish fertilizer, fish oil, marine collagen, fish protein, algae, seaweed, fish or shark cartilage and sea shells for use as dietary supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Seafood products, namely, dried seafood and smoked seafood; frozen and unfrozen prepared meals, entrees, appetizers and frozen and unfrozen snacks consisting primarily of seafood; seafood, namely, soup and chowders; fish and chips; maple butter; maple jellies; seafood products, namely, fresh seafood, canned seafood and frozen seafood | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Seafood sauces, seafood seasonings; mixes for making seafood batters; mixes for making seafood breadings; maple syrup products, namely, maple syrup, maple candies, maple chocolates, maple sugar, maple taffy, maple fudge | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |