CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ICHEF

USPTO serial 85366918

ICHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott E. Charney

Scott E. Charney Charney IP Law LLC233 Mount Airy RoadSuite 100Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless cooking system incorporating a first unit having a thermometer, a wireless transmitter adapted to transmit temperature readings, and a second unit primarily comprising a wireless receiver adapted to receive the transmitted temperature readings, data input elements, namely, a capacitive touchscreen designed for multi-touch sensing, for controlling the system including selecting a meat choice and a taste preference associated with the selected meat choice and a visual display, namely, a liquid crystal display for monitoring cooking operationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 1, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 6, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 5, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance