USPTO serial 85371849
NOTE TO SELF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOTE TO SELF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Cooper
KEITH COOPER DE LA PENA & HOLIDAY, LLPOne Embarcadero, Suite 2860SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education and entertainment services, namely, ongoing television public service announcements and ongoing television programs in the field of self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management; educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks; entertainment in the nature of an on-going special variety, news, music or comedy show featuring a fictitious therapist/doctor providing lessons and entertainment related to self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management; entertainment services, namely, an on-going series featuring a fictitious therapist/doctor providing lesson and entertainment related to self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management provided through webcasts and television broadcasts; entertainment services, namely, providing on-going television programs in the field of a fictitious therapist/doctor providing lessons and entertainment related to self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management via a global computer network; entertainment, namely, a continuing variety show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media featuring a fictitious therapist/doctor providing lessons and entertainment related to self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management; entertainment, namely, a continuing variety show featuring a fictitious therapist/doctor providing lessons and entertainment related to self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management broadcast over television, radio, satellite, and the internet; entertainment, namely, production of television shows, continuing shows broadcast over the internet and motion picture films concerning a fictitious therapist/doctor providing lessons and entertainment related to self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management; film and video film production; film and video production; production and distribution of independent motion pictures; production and distribution of motion pictures; production of cable television programs; production of dvds, videotapes and television programs featuring shows and motion picture films concerning a fictitious therapist/doctor providing lessons and entertainment related to self improvement, life improvement, organization, life management; production of films; production of radio and television programs; provision of non-downloadable films and movies via a video-on-demand service; provision of non-downloadable films and television programmes via a video-on-demand service | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |