Drawing for THE PARTNER

USPTO serial 85383074

THE PARTNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PARTNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded films and television programmes on digital video disc, videotapes of electronic media; downloadable films and television programmes featuring information about business development and business consultancy provided via a video on demand serviceACTIVE
016printed matter, namely, magazines, pamphlets and books relating to business management and development and business consultancy; photographs; stationery, office requisites, namely, pens, pencils, note paper, printed instructional and teaching material in the fields of business development and business consultancy; document folders in the form of walletsACTIVE
018luggage; briefcases, credit card cases, wallets, purses, travel bags; umbrellasACTIVE
038television broadcasting; cable television broadcasting; satellite transmission services, television and radio broadcastingACTIVE
041production of radio and television programmes; production of films; publishing on-line electronic publications; arranging and conducting of conferences, seminars, workshops and exhibitions all educational in nature and in the field of business development and business consultancyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Dec 17, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 7, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 29, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 29, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 26, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 25, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 24, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 23, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 29, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 3, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Aug 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance