USPTO serial 85383087
VERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Peterborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harvey S. Kauget
HARVEY S. KAUGET PHELPS DUNBAR LLP100 S ASHLEY DR STE 1900TAMPA, FL 33602-5315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines in the field of working, volunteering and studying abroad, adventure travel and international development | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing an on-line search-able computer database featuring information on working, volunteering and studying abroad, adventure travel and international development.; Providing a website featuring information on working, volunteering and studying abroad, adventure travel and international development.; Provision of entertainment and cultural activities, namely organization and provision of public speaking engagements, and interviews all in the fields of working, volunteering and studying abroad, adventure travel and international development.; Provision of entertainment and cultural activities, namely organization and provision of photo exhibits and photo documentaries in the fields of working, volunteering and studying abroad, adventure travel and international development.; Provision of entertainment and cultural activities, namely teleconferencing and video documentaries in the fields of working, volunteering and studying abroad, adventure travel and international development | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | On-line social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |