USPTO serial 85384212
ECCHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4204640Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2012
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECCHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of white papers, slide presentations, presentation notes, document summaries, and informational course materials, all on the topics of frequently asked questions on the check payment industry, descriptions and explanations of Check Clearing for the 2lst Century Act and Regulation CC, ECCHO Rules, activities and decisions of Operations Committee, endorsement considerations for checks, return check hierarchy decision standards, detecting and avoiding duplicate payments, Check 21 Act substitute check handling, Check 21 Expedited Recredit requirements and considerations, minimum Check 21 Compliance Requirements, processing quality standards, grey scale and black and white images for substitute check standards, Tiff Tag discussions, banking practices agreements, and industry perspectives on Check Image Exchange | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 1997 |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, white papers, hard copies of slide presentations, presentation notes, informational course materials and document summaries, all on the topics of frequently asked questions on the check payment industry, descriptions and explanations of Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act and Regulation CC, ECCHO Rules, activities and decisions of Operations Committee, endorsement considerations for checks, return check hierarchy decision standards, detecting and avoiding duplicate payments, Check 21 Act substitute check handling, Check 21 Expedited Recredit requirements and considerations, minimum Check 21 Compliance Requirements, processing quality standards, grey scale and black and white images for substitute check standards, Tiff Tag discussions, banking practices agreements, and industry perspectives on Check Image Exchange | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 3, 1992 |
| 035 | Business consultation services about development and maintenance of Uniform Commercial Code clearinghouse rules to allocate liabilities among member financial institutions engaged in the interbank collection, return and adjustment of check images; consensus building, namely, promoting awareness of best practices, standards and rules for check images, among its members, financial services organizations and other check payment industry organizations; public advocacy for statutory and regulatory changes at the state and national levels; promoting industry awareness in the financial services industry on the issue of enhanced efficiencies and reduced risks in the check payment system | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 1991 |
| 041 | Development of industry file and format standards for the exchange of check images and check payments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 3, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Check Clearing House Organization
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ECCHO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |