USPTO serial 85384390
HURRICANE GLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HURRICANE GLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burnaby, BC V5J 4M3, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |