USPTO serial 85387514
POWER EDGE PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2018
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.
Need help with POWER EDGE PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quinn's Power Edge Hockey Inc.
Ridgeway, Ontario, CA
Quinn's Power Edge Hockey Inc.
Markham, Ontario, CA
Quinn's Power Edge Hockey Inc.
Markham, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [ Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, long sleeve t-shirts, shorts, sweatshirts, jackets, gloves, mittens, sports jerseys, scarves, hats, and athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats, caps, and athletic uniforms ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Athletic equipment, namely, hockey pucks, hockey sticks, hockey gloves, hockey stick racks, hockey tape, [ ringette rings, ringette sticks, ringette ] stick racks, ringette gloves, floorball balls, [ floorball gloves, ] and floorball sticks; athletic training device, namely, a skating training device consisting of a raised frame with a simulated hockey blade attachment used for the purpose of developing and improving speed, coordination, conditioning, hand speed, balance, edge control and accuracy in skating, puck handling, passing, shooting, receiving, and stick handling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quinn's Power Edge Hockey Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quinn's Power Edge Hockey Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quinn's Power Edge Hockey Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named POWER EDGE PRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |