USPTO serial 85390521
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer services, namely, encrypted data recovery services; Data encryption and decoding services; Data encryption services; Development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment, information security, business analysis, audit and audit planning, and sales management; Development of security systems and contingency planning for information systems; Development of software for secure network operations; Inserting software protection programs and security programs onto magnetic media; Maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; On-line security services, namely, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows vendors to submit electronic invoices to sales representative agencies for importing and processing of electronic invoices to save time and improve accuracy; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows device based user authentication; Providing a secure, web-based service enabling individuals to remotely create and manage their own accounts so that whatever private content they upload now can be encrypted, then delivered to their intended recipients, at the time and in the manner requested; Providing a secured-access website that gives registered Internet networked institutions the ability to upload, view, copy, print, download and share documents and images for the purposes of conducting consumer-driven transactions; Providing a secured-access, members only website featuring technology that gives members the ability to have secured access; Providing a secured-access, members only website featuring technology that gives registered Internet networked dental professionals the ability to communicate and share data for the purposes of designing and manufacturing dental restorations; Providing a website that features technology that enables the secure exchange of information by users; Research in the field of intelligence and security technology; Updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks | ABANDONED | Oct 5, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |