USPTO serial 85390961
µ-HEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with µ-HEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR CONVEYING, DISTRIBUTING, TRANSFORMING, STORING, REGULATING OR CONTROLLING ENERGY TO ENSURE A CONSTANT SUPPLY OF ENERGY AND POWER | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, SERVICING AND REPAIR OF ENERGY AND POWER GENERATING APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | GENERATION OF POWER AND ELECTRICITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN OF ENERGY AND POWER SYSTEMS; DATA ANALYSIS OF ENERGY SYSTEMS RELATING TO ENERGY AND POWER NEEDS OF OTHERS; DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY AND POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; PROJECT STUDIES AND PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES ALL RELATING TO POWER AND ENERGY NEEDS OF OTHERS AND GENERATION AND SUPPLY OF POWER AND ENERGY; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS, NAMELY, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, COMPLIANCE AND PLANNING; DESIGN SERVICES FOR POWER PLANTS, NAMELY, DESIGN OF POWER PLANTS; EVALUATION AND PLANNING OF ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHERS; DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY FORMS OF ENERGY AND POWER, AND ENERGY STORAGE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by L-3 Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named µ-HEMS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |