USPTO serial 85391094
KLEAN KIDZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLEAN KIDZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair shampoos and conditioners ; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form ; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body ; Bar soaps ; Soaps for body care ; Hand soaps ; Baby soaps ; Sunscreen creams ; Waterproof sunscreen ; Skin moisturizers ; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions ; Toothpastes ; Mouth washes ; Antibacterial soap ; Antibacterial skin soaps ; Disinfectant soaps ; Disinfectant hand soaps ; Hand cleaning gels ; Hand cleaning sanitizers ; Hand cleaning preparations ; Medicated soaps ; Organic soap bars ; Natural soap bars ; Natural cocoa butter based personal care products, namely, body lotion, shower gel, soap, body and foot scrub and non-medicated skin creams ; 3-in-1 organic soap bars for use as soap, shampoo and conditioner ; Baby lotion ; Baby oils ; Baby powders ; Baby wipes ; Disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for (personal hygiene) ; Shower and bath gel ; Bath salts ; Bath beads ; Bath cream ; Bath oil ; Bath foams ; Bath crystals ; Bath fizzies ; Bath flakes ; Bath lotion ; Bubble bath ; Anti-cavity dental rinses ; Anti-cavity mouth rinses | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Bottled water ; Drinking water ; Spring water ; Mineral water ; Purified bottled drinking water ; Carbonated waters ; Sparkling water ; Water beverages ; Flavored waters ; Cola ; Soda pops ; Soft drinks ; Fruit flavored soft drinks ; Fruit juice ; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages ; Sports drinks ; Energy drinks ; Frozen fruit drinks ; Ice cream soda ; Iced fruit beverages ; Sherbets (beverages) ; Sorbets in the nature of beverages ; Soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes ; Iced soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes ; Punch (non-alcoholic) ; Smoothies (fruit beverages, fruit predominating) ; Vegetable juice (beverage) ; Vegetable-fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |