USPTO serial 85391326
BOSWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOSWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald
JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |