USPTO serial 85391687
GIRL WONDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSEN, EMILY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIRL WONDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory H. Guillot
Gregory H. Guillot Gregory H. Guillot, P.C.13727 Noel Road, Suite 200Dallas, TX 75240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry boxes not of metal, marketed to children, adolescents, and teenagers in packaging depicting a female child entertainer and her band | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Picture and photograph frames; beds; benches; cabinets; chairs; computer furniture; desks; furniture; hand-held mirrors; jewelry boxes not of metal; key fobs not of metal; law furniture; mirrors; party ornaments of plastic; pillows; wall plaques of wood or plastic; plastic cake decorations; sleeping bags; and tables, all of which are marketed to children, adolescents, and teenagers in packaging depicting a female child entertainer and promoting the music, film and video productions thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 16, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |