USPTO serial 85392432
EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOLDING BENJAMIN ET EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD, PREGNY S.A.
Pregny-Chambésy, CH
Other trademarks owned by HOLDING BENJAMIN ET EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD, PREGNY S.A.
HOLDING BENJAMIN ET EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD, PREGNY S.A.
Pregny-Chambésy, CH
Other trademarks owned by HOLDING BENJAMIN ET EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD, PREGNY S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
HELEN HILL MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-7437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Equipment for processing secure payments, for computerized communications networks such as the Internet, and for useful purposes, namely, money-counting and sorting machines, automatic cash dispensers, pocket calculators, false-coin detectors, readers for smart cards or cards with microprocessors, magnetically encoded bank and credit cards, and computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, pamphlets, brochures, newspapers, journals and magazines, all featuring information in the field of finance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOLDING BENJAMIN ET EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD, PREGNY S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by HOLDING BENJAMIN ET EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD, PREGNY S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named EDMOND DE ROTHSCHILD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |