USPTO serial 85394813
ENERKEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2018
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active. Follow Madrid and USPTO deadlines for the next renewal cycle.
Need help with ENERKEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca A. Liebowitz
Rebecca A. Liebowitz VENABLE LLPPO Box 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Biobased chemicals for use in the further manufacture of biofuels, namely, methanol | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Biofuels, namely, methanol | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Retail and wholesale biofuels and biobased chemicals supply services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Production of biofuels and biobased chemicals for others; waste management ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enerkem, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enerkem, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enerkem, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ENERKEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2025 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |