USPTO serial 85394861
AF AMFIRST INSURANCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AF AMFIRST INSURANCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Carmody
STEPHEN J CARMODY BRUNINI GRANTHAM GROWER & HEWES PLLCPO BOX 119190 EAST CAPITOL STREET SUITE 100JACKSON, MS 39201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, underwriting, issuance and administration of health, life, accident, vision and dental insurance policies where the issuing company continues to assume all risks and payment of claims on the policies but with another company assuming duties of payment of claims, issuance of policies and other underwriting duties | ABANDONED | Dec 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |