USPTO serial 85395225
VITAE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITAE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONGUEUIL, QUEBEC, CA
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 North Capitol Street, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soups, preparations for making soups; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, frozen yogurt; cheese, yogurts, drinkable yogurts, yogurt drinks, yogurt-based beverages; fresh and mold-ripened cheese; edible oils and fats, margarine, butter, lard; mixed processed nuts, processed praline nuts; mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of yogurt beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Rice; sugar, tapioca, sago; flour; bread, pastry; confectionary, namely, candies, chocolate, marzipan and caramel, cakes, donuts, biscuits and muffins; muffin mixes; cake and bread mixes; ice cream, sherbet and frozen candy; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; mustard; vinegar, vinaigrettes and prepared sauces, namely, bearnaise sauce, raclette sauce, curry sauce, bordeaux sauce, madeira sauce, bolognese sauce, tomato sauce, ketchup, sorrel sauce; pasta, cornstarch, semolina, processed couscous; spices, salt, flower of salt; frozen yogurt; frozen yogurt confections; frozen yogurt mixes; frozen yogurt parfaits; yogurt-based shakes; shakes; parfaits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |