Drawing for HERITAGE COLLECTION

USPTO serial 85395780

HERITAGE COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HERITAGE COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gino Cheng

GINO CHENG ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN STREETSUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614-8255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Lenses for sunglasses; Spectacles and sunglasses; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses; Sunglasses and spectaclesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2014MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 14, 2014ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 9, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 29, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 29, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 16, 2013EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED
May 16, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
May 16, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
May 16, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Mar 19, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 15, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 14, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 14, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 14, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 12, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 12, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 17, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Aug 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance