Drawing for GRADATIM FEROCITER

USPTO serial 85397105

GRADATIM FEROCITER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRADATIM FEROCITER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Vana

JAMES L. VANA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Aerospace vehicle parts, namely, rockets for use with aerospace vehicles; aerospace vehicles, namely, launch vehicles and spacecraftACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 17, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 10, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 7, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance