Drawing for PRCEASYVIEW.COM

USPTO serial 85447154

PRCEASYVIEW.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ARANT, LUCY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRCEASYVIEW.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Guinan

DANIEL J GUINAN FRASER STRYKER PC LLO500 ENERGY PLAZA409 SOUTH 17TH STREETOMAHA, NE 68102-2663

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044providing an online computer database featuring information pertaining to healthcare related research survey information on patients, physicians, employees and community healthcare needsACTIVEJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 9, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 19, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 18, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 25, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 16, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance