USPTO serial 85448691
QADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development of game software; Rental of a database server to third parties; Development of data processing programs; Developing of driver and operating system software; Programming of multimedia applications; Design of semiconductors and integrated circuits; Design of semiconductors; Design of semiconductor chips; Hosting web sites relating to real estate; Recovery of damaged computer programs; Web design, namely, design of home pages and web sites; Web site development; Application service provider, namely, management of web sites for others; Web site design; Web site maintenance for others; Creating and maintaining web sites for others; Hosting web sites; Rental of web servers; Web page design; Rental of application software; Providing search engines for the internet; Providing internet security programs, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for providing internet security; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Application service provider featuring software for use in database management of web sites for electronic commerce; Maintenance of web sites for electronic commerce for others; Computer programming for electronic commerce; IC design, namely, design of integrated circuits; Design of integrated circuits; Data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; Development of computer game software; Duplication of computer game software; Maintenance of computer game software; Computer game programming, namely, computer programming of computer games; Computers system analysis; Computers consultancy; Computer research, namely, research of computer software; Advisory services relating to computers, namely, advice relating to the design of computer hardware; Computer rental; Recovery of computer data; Design of computer microchips; Computer virus protection services; Computer security consultancy; Computer software development; Rental of computer software; Computer software design; Computer software consultancy; Design of computer software; Installation of computer software; Repair of computer software; Updating of computer software; Computer software research; Maintenance of computer software; Advisory and development service of computer software, namely, providing advice concerning computer software development; Computer system design services; Computer systems analysis; Design and development of computer systems; Computer rental; Computer programming; Development of computer programs; Duplication of computer programs; Rental of computer programs; Computer hardware development; Design of computer hardware; Consultancy in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |