USPTO serial 85449141
TERRENAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TERRENAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless location systems consisting of software and hardware for signal transmission, reception and processing, namely, a wide-area network of terrestrially-placed transmitters broadcasting a proprietary signal consisting of timing information, selected local environmental information and other information that can be received and processed by computer software and hardware in a consumer electronics or other device such that the device can determine its latitude, longitude and altitude; electronic signal receivers and related computer hardware and software capable of receiving, processing and analyzing said signal for use in consumer electronics and other devices, and of combining said signal with signals or other information from other sources, including but not limited to remote or onboard databases and other networks for purpose of enhancing the latitude, longitude or altitude or other positioning information | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Wireless telecommunications services, namely, wireless location signal transmission services; providing access to telecommunication networks for the purpose of receiving information relating to the location of consumer electronics and other devices; transmission of data and information relating to the location of consumer electronics and other devices, including but not limited to employees or pedestrians with such devices on their person | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Storage of data and information relating to the location of consumer electronics and other devices, including but not limited to employees or pedestrians with such devices on their person | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of software and computer hardware for use in a transmitter location system; providing an online network environment that features wireless location systems that enables users to locate consumer electronics and other devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security tracking and monitoring services, namely, tracking of individuals' locations for personal security and safety reasons; security and safety services, namely, providing location services to wireless devices to determine the locations of persons and devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NextNav, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NextNav, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TERRENAV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |