USPTO serial 85449713
RAIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2016
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with RAIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Floratine Products Group, Inc.
Collierville, TN
Floratine Products Group, Inc.
Collierville, TN
Floratine Products Group, Inc.
Collierville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
susan fentress
susan fentress Veritay Group IP PLLC3 N. Dunlap StreetVan Vleet Building, Suite 332Memphis, TN 38163Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adjuvant for use with agricultural chemicals; Adjuvants for use with pesticides for agricultural use and for commercial landscaping use in the golf and sports turf maintenance markets; Chemicals for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides; Surfactants for use in connection with agricultural pesticides | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Floratine Products Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Floratine Products Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Floratine Products Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named RAIDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |