USPTO serial 85451314
ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PIPELINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PIPELINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle M. Marsh, Esq.
MICHELLE M. MARSH, ESQ. Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters and electronic newsletters; equipment, supplies and facilities for use in the transportation and storage of oil, natural gas liquids and petroleum products; equipment, supplies and facilitates related to marine terminals; informational programs, namely, maintaining a web site and maintaining a telephone call centre providing information relating to pipeline and marine terminal projects; facilitating community involvement in the regulatory review of pipeline and marine terminal projects; publishing newsletters and electronic newsletters; transportation and storage of oil, natural gas liquids, and petroleum products; marine services; construction of pipelines for the transportation of oil, natural gas liquids and petroleum products; operation and maintenance of pipelines transporting oil, natural gas liquids and petroleum products; construction of marine terminals; operation and maintenance of marine terminals; employment, training and education services in the fields of construction, operation, maintenance and management of pipelines and marine terminals; financial sponsorship of community projects and programs related to education, health and safety, culture and community leadership and the environment; operating a community investment fund to support community projects and programs related to education, health and safety, culture and community leadership and the environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |