USPTO serial 85451682
SNOWBEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNOWBEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRINCETON, ONTARIO, CA
Guelph, Ontario N1H1A4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Schnurr
DAVID J. SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLP295 HAGEY BLVD STE 300WATERLOO, N2L6R5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | mechanical salt spreaders; snow blower attachment for a vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |